Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38893099›Full record

ReviewCancers2024

Practical Application of Deep Learning in Diagnostic Neuropathology-Reimagining a Histological Asset in the Era of Precision Medicine.

Katherine Rich, Kira Tosefsky, Karina C Martin, Ali Bashashati, Stephen Yip

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katherine RichBioinformatics Graduate Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.ORCID 0009-0000-5074-3441
Kira TosefskyFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8483-8980
Karina C MartinFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.ORCID 0009-0001-4541-1036
Ali BashashatiDepartment of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Stephen YipFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8514-9861

Funding

Michael Smith Health Research BC HPI-2022-2834Michael Smith Health Research BC SCH-2021-1546Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council RGPIN-2019-04896
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past few decades, neuropathology has experienced several paradigm shifts with the introduction of new technologies. Deep learning, a rapidly progressing subfield of machine learning, seems to be the next innovation to alter the diagnostic workflow. In this review, we will explore the recent changes in the field of neuropathology and how this has led to an increased focus on molecular features in diagnosis and prognosis. Then, we will examine the work carried out to train deep learning models for various diagnostic tasks in neuropathology, as well as the machine learning frameworks they used. Focus will be given to both the challenges and successes highlighted therein, as well as what these trends may tell us about future roadblocks in the widespread adoption of this new technology. Finally, we will touch on recent trends in deep learning, as applied to digital pathology more generally, and what this may tell us about the future of deep learning applications in neuropathology.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningneuropathology

Identifiers

PMID38893099
PMCPMC11171052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.