Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38892880›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024

Percutaneous Endovascular Reconstruction of the Common Femoral Artery and Its Bifurcation.

Stephanie Rassam, Raphaël Coscas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Treatment Options in Isolated Atherosclerotic Popliteal Artery Disease.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stephanie RassamDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Heart, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6485-5062
Raphaël CoscasDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Ambroise Paré, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 92104 Boulogne-Billancourt cedex, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4428-2877

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Occlusive lesions of the common femoral artery (CFA) and its bifurcation have traditionally been treated with open surgery. Although long-term patency rates after open surgery are excellent, such repairs are associated with substantial local and general morbidity. In recent years, different treatment options have emerged within percutaneous endovascular repair. We hereby present a narrative review on endovascular treatment modalities and a treatment algorithm for endovascular revascularisation of the CFA and its bifurcation. Lesion analysis, access issues, vessel preparation tools, and types of repairs with or without the involvement of the bifurcation are described. Based on current data, an interventional approach can result in high technical success and acceptable mid-term patency rates. Further comparative evidence with open surgery and/or between the different types of endovascular repairs is required to improve the current treatment algorithm.

Indexed as

endovascular proceduresfemoral arteryperipheral arterial diseasevascular calcification

Identifiers

PMID38892880
PMCPMC11173178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.