ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024
Comparative Assessment of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biopsies vs. Percutaneous Biopsies of Pancreatic Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contrast-enhanced ultrasound as a non-invasive diagnostic modality for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: The question of Ki67 for study validation.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Trans-Sigmoidal Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy of Pancreatic Allograft in Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplant Recipient: A Novel Approach Following Conventional Technique Failure.ACG case reports journal · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based MVIT-MLKA model for accurate classification of pancreatic lesions: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.La Radiologia medica · 2025Article
- Precision in practice: The diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration/fine needle biopsy cytology in pancreatic mass lesions.CytoJournal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.