Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38892717›Full record

ReviewNutrients2024

Association of Placental Pathology with Physical and Neuronal Development of Infants: A Narrative Review and Reclassification of the Literature by the Consensus Statement of the Amsterdam Placental Workshop Group.

Chizuko Yaguchi, Megumi Ueda, Yuri Mizuno, Chie Fukuchi, Masako Matsumoto, Naomi Furuta-Isomura, Hiroaki Itoh

Abstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chizuko YaguchiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu 431-3192, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7166-423X
Megumi UedaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu 431-3192, Japan.
Yuri MizunoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu 431-3192, Japan.
Chie FukuchiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu 431-3192, Japan.
Masako MatsumotoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu 431-3192, Japan.
Naomi Furuta-IsomuraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu 431-3192, Japan.
Hiroaki ItohDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu 431-3192, Japan.

Funding

AMED JP20gm1310009Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI JP23K09544, JP22K15917, JP20K16886, JP20H03823, JP24K02585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The placenta is the largest fetal organ, which connects the mother to the fetus and supports most aspects of organogenesis through the transport of nutrients and gases. However, further studies are needed to assess placental pathology as a reliable predictor of long-term physical growth or neural development in newborns. The Consensus Statement of the Amsterdam Placental Workshop Group (APWGCS) on the sampling and definition of placental lesions has resulted in diagnostic uniformity in describing the most common pathological lesions of the placenta and contributed to the international standardization of descriptions of placental pathology. In this narrative review, we reclassified descriptions of placental pathology from previously published papers according to the APWGCS criteria and comparatively assessed the relationship with infantile physical and/or neural development. After reclassification and reevaluation, placental pathology of maternal vascular malperfusion, one of the APWGCS criteria, emerged as a promising candidate as a universal predictor of negative infantile neurodevelopmental outcomes, not only in term and preterm deliveries but also in high-risk groups of very low birthweight newborns. However, there are few studies that examined placental pathology according to the full categories of APWGCS and also included low-risk general infants. It is necessary to incorporate the assessment of placental pathology utilizing APWGCS in the design of future birth cohort studies as well as in follow-up investigations of high-risk infants.

Indexed as

ConsensusPlacentaChild DevelopmentFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornNetherlandsPlacenta DiseasesPregnancyinfantsneural developmentnutrients transportpathologyphysical developmentplacenta

Identifiers

PMID38892717
PMCPMC11174896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.