Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38892597›Full record

ArticleNutrients2024

Nasogastric Tube Feeding in Anorexia Nervosa: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis on Clinical Efficacy and Treatment Satisfaction.

Matteo Martini, Paola Longo, Clara Di Benedetto, Nadia Delsedime, Matteo Panero, Giovanni Abbate-Daga, Federica Toppino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Matteo MartiniEating Disorders Center, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Via Cherasco 11, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8877-0138
Paola LongoEating Disorders Center, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Via Cherasco 11, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1347-7054
Clara Di BenedettoEating Disorders Center, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Via Cherasco 11, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Nadia DelsedimeEating Disorders Center, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Via Cherasco 11, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Matteo PaneroEating Disorders Center, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Via Cherasco 11, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9385-0332
Giovanni Abbate-DagaEating Disorders Center, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Via Cherasco 11, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5826-5664
Federica ToppinoEating Disorders Center, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Via Cherasco 11, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1524-1272

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The choice of a refeeding strategy is essential in the inpatient treatment of Anorexia Nervosa (AN). Oral nutrition is usually the first choice, but enteral nutrition through the use of a Nasogastric Tube (NGT) often becomes necessary in hospitalized patients. The literature provides mixed results on the efficacy of this method in weight gain, and there is a scarcity of studies researching its psychological correlates. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of oral versus enteral refeeding strategies in inpatients with AN, focusing on Body Mass Index (BMI) increase and treatment satisfaction, alongside assessing personality traits. We analyzed data from 241 inpatients, comparing a group of treated vs. non-treated individuals, balancing confounding factors using propensity score matching, and applied regression analysis to matched groups. The findings indicate that enteral therapy significantly enhances BMI without impacting treatment satisfaction, accounting for the therapeutic alliance. Personality traits showed no significant differences between patients undergoing oral or enteral refeeding. The study highlights the clinical efficacy of enteral feeding in weight gain, supporting its use in severe AN cases when oral refeeding is inadequate without adversely affecting patient satisfaction or being influenced by personality traits.

Indexed as

Anorexia NervosaBody Mass IndexEnteral NutritionIntubation, GastrointestinalPatient SatisfactionPropensity ScoreAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleTreatment OutcomeWeight GainYoung Adultanorexia nervosaeating disordersenteral feedingnasogastric tubenutritional rehabilitationtreatment satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID38892597
PMCPMC11174568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.