Significant Differences in Intestinal Bacterial Communities of Sympatric Bean Goose, Hooded Crane, and Domestic Goose.

Jing Yin, Dandan Yuan, Ziqiu Xu, Yuannuo Wu, Zhong Chen, Xingjia Xiang

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jing YinSchool of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China.

Dandan YuanSchool of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China.

Ziqiu XuSchool of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China.

Yuannuo WuSchool of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China.

Zhong ChenSchool of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China.

Xingjia XiangSchool of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4410-1789

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31801989, 32171530Outstanding Youth Research Project of Anhui Province 2022AH030015

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The host's physiological well-being is intricately associated with the gut microbiota. However, previous studies regarding the intestinal microbiota have focused on domesticated or captive birds. This study used high-throughput sequencing technology to identify the gut bacterial communities of sympatric bean geese, hooded cranes, and domestic geese. The results indicated that the gut bacterial diversity in domestic geese and hooded cranes showed considerably higher diversity than bean geese. The gut bacterial community compositions varied significantly among the three hosts (

Indexed as

bean goosedomestic goosegut bacterial communityhooded cranepathogens

Identifiers

PMID38891737

DOI10.3390/ani14111688

PMCPMC11170997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.