ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024
The Honey Bee Colony's Criterion for Candidate Selection: "Ongoing" or "One-Shot"?
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the honey bee, the queen's death severely threatens the survival of the colony. In an emergency, new queens are reared from young worker larvae, where nepotism is thought to influence the choice of queen candidates by the workers. This article simulates the emergency queen-rearing process in a colony under natural conditions and records the results of colony selection (without nepotism). In queenless colonies, worker larvae aged three days or younger were preferred for queen rearing, and 1-day-old larvae were the first to be selected for the queen-cell cups. In the capping stage, the number of capped queen cells selected from the 1-day-old larvae was much higher than the 3-day-old larvae. On the first day, the number of emerging queens reared from 1-day-old larvae was significantly higher than the queens reared from 2-day-old and 3-day-old larvae. However, there was no significant difference in the birth weights of queens reared from 1-day-old, 2-day-old, or 3-day-old larvae. When the newly emerged queens were introduced into the original queenless colony, 1-day-old larval queens triggered more worker followers than 2-day-old larval queens. The expression of ovarian development-related genes (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.