Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38891565›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024

Laying Hens: Why Smothering and Not Surviving?-A Literature Review.

Caroline Citta Mazocco, Sérgio Luís de Castro Júnior, Robson Mateus Freitas Silveira, Rosangela Poletto, Iran José Oliveira da Silva

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Caroline Citta MazoccoNúcleo de Pesquisa em Ambiência (NUPEA), Escola Superior de Agricultura ''Luiz de Queiroz'' (ESALQ), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Piracicaba 13418-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9166-3026
Sérgio Luís de Castro JúniorNúcleo de Pesquisa em Ambiência (NUPEA), Escola Superior de Agricultura ''Luiz de Queiroz'' (ESALQ), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Piracicaba 13418-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1125-0430
Robson Mateus Freitas SilveiraNúcleo de Pesquisa em Ambiência (NUPEA), Escola Superior de Agricultura ''Luiz de Queiroz'' (ESALQ), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Piracicaba 13418-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2285-9695
Rosangela PolettoInstituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Rio Grande do Sul (IFRS)-Campus Sertão, Sertão 99170-000, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2096-1576
Iran José Oliveira da SilvaNúcleo de Pesquisa em Ambiência (NUPEA), Escola Superior de Agricultura ''Luiz de Queiroz'' (ESALQ), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Piracicaba 13418-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4416-8433

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proliferation of rearing systems providing opportunities for birds to engage in natural behaviors can trigger behavioral repertoires that when not manageable compromise animal welfare and the economic viability of the flock. Smothering in laying hens has long been perceived as "natural" or the result of hysteria among birds in the flock. However, the current literature has recognized smothering as an abnormal outcome with the potential to result in significant losses in cage-free poultry systems. Recent studies have specifically aimed to categorize the organization of smothering behavior and highlight its potential causes and consequences. In this study, literature review and bibliographic mapping, drawing on published articles and engagement with poultry farmers through extension and rural technical assistance, were employed. The findings indicate that smothering is a behavior triggered by factors related to the environment in which the laying hens are kept. This study concludes that there is a critical need for more rigorous and detailed research to elucidate the nuances of avian behavioral physiology and assess the impact of production systems on animal welfare and the economic impacts on the flock. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of bird behavior in high-production environments and provides practical insights for the poultry industry.

Indexed as

animal welfareanomalous behaviorcage freefree rangepoultrypoultry farming

Identifiers

PMID38891565
PMCPMC11171085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.