Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38891509›Full record

ArticlePolymers2024

Gelatin and Collagen from Sheepskin.

Andrea Marie E Matinong, Kim L Pickering, Mark R Waterland, Yusuf Chisti, Richard G Haverkamp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrea Marie E MatinongSchool of Food and Natural Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.
Kim L PickeringSchool of Engineering, University of Waikato, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-2694-4432
Mark R WaterlandSchool of Food and Natural Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.
Yusuf ChistiInstitute of Tropical Aquaculture and Fisheries, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Kuala Nerus 21030, Malaysia.
Richard G HaverkampSchool of Food and Natural Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-3890-7105

Funding

Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation C20714Ministry of Business Innovation & Employment UOWX2004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abattoirs dispose of sheepskins as solid waste due to low price and poor demand for sheepskin leather. In principle, as an alternative to being disposed of in landfill, sheepskins can serve as a source of the protein collagen or the hydrolysis product, gelatin. In this research, sheepskins collected from abattoirs were used as a source of collagen. Three extraction methods were compared: acid extraction, acid with enzymes, and alkali extraction. The extracted material was characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), and sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). The collagen and gelatin extraction yield ranged from 3.1% to 4.8% with the product purity determined by hydroxyproline, ranging from 7.8% for the alkali process to 59% and 68% for the acid and acid-enzyme processes. SDS PAGE showed that the acid process produced fragments with molecular weights in the range 100 to >250 kDa, while acid-enzyme resulted in smaller fragments, below 30 kDa. The FTIR region of the amide I band at 1800-1550 cm

Indexed as

collagenextractiongelatinsheepskin

Identifiers

PMID38891509
PMCPMC11174695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.