Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38891494›Full record

ReviewPolymers2024

Depollution of Polymeric Leather Waste by Applying the Most Current Methods of Chromium Extraction.

Ana-Maria Nicoleta Codreanu Manea, Daniela Simina Stefan, Lidia Kim, Mircea Stefan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ana-Maria Nicoleta Codreanu ManeaDepartment of Analytical Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest, Polizu Street, No 1-7, 011061 Bucharest, Romania.
Daniela Simina StefanDepartment of Analytical Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest, Polizu Street, No 1-7, 011061 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-9787-194X
Lidia KimDepartment for Evaluation, Monitoring Environmental Pollution, National Research and Development Institute for Industrial Ecology, Drumul Podu Dambovitei Street, No 57-73, 060652 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-4252-6302
Mircea StefanPharmacy Faculty, "Titu Maiorescu" University, 22 Dâmbovnicului Street, 040441 Bucharest, Romania.

Funding

Ministerul Cercetării și Inovării 3N/2022, Project PN 23 22 04 01.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The leather industry is one of the most polluting industries in the world due to the large amounts of waste following raw hide processing but also due to the high content of chemical substances present in leather waste. The main problem with chromium-tanned leather solid waste is related to the storage, due to the ability of chromium to leach into soil or water, and also owing to the high ability of trivalent chromium to oxidize to its toxic form, hexavalent chromium. The purpose of this article is to present the most current methods of chromium extraction from solid tanned leather waste in order to obtain non-polluting leather, which can constitute secondary raw material in new industrial processes. The extraction methods identified in the present study are based on acid/basic/enzymatic hydrolysis and substitution with the help of organic chelators (organic acids and organic acid salts). In addition, this study includes a comparative analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of each identified extraction method. At the same time, this study also presents alternative chromium extraction methods based on the combination of conventional extraction methods and ultrasound-assisted extraction.

Indexed as

chromium removalcircular economyhydrolysis methodleather solid wastesubstitution method

Identifiers

PMID38891494
PMCPMC11175144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.