Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38891421›Full record

ArticlePolymers2024

Stability and Composting Behaviour of PLA-Starch Laminates Containing Active Extracts and Cellulose Fibres from Rice Straw.

Pedro A V Freitas, Chelo González-Martínez, Amparo Chiralt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pedro A V FreitasInstitute of Food Engineering FoodUPV, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain.
Chelo González-MartínezInstitute of Food Engineering FoodUPV, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9993-8303
Amparo ChiraltInstitute of Food Engineering FoodUPV, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1134-8144

Funding

Generalitat Valenciana CIPROM/2021/071Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades AGROALNEXT/2022/026Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades European Union NextGenerationEU (PRTR-C17.I1)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The stability and composting behaviour of monolayers and laminates of poly (lactic acid) (PLA) and starch with and without active extracts and cellulose fibres from rice straw (RS) were evaluated. The retrogradation of the starch throughout storage (1, 5, and 10 weeks) gave rise to stiffer and less extensible monolayers with lower water vapour barrier capacity. In contrast, the PLA monolayers, with or without extract, did not show marked changes with storage. However, these changes were more attenuated in the bilayers that gained water vapour and oxygen barrier capacity during storage, maintaining the values of the different properties close to the initial range. The bioactivity of the active films exhibited a slight decrease during storage, so the antioxidant capacity is better preserved in the bilayers. All monolayer and bilayer films were fully composted within 90 days but with different behaviour. The bilayer assembly enhanced the biodegradation of PLA, whose monolayer exhibited a lag period of about 35 days. The active extract reduced the biodegradation rate of both mono- and bilayers but did not limit the material biodegradation within the time established in the Standard. Therefore, PLA-starch laminates, with or without the valorised fractions from RS, can be considered as biodegradable and stable materials for food packaging applications.

Indexed as

bilayer filmsbiodegradable materialscellulose fibresphenolic compoundsvalorisation of residues

Identifiers

PMID38891421
PMCPMC11174990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.