Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38891333›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Responses of Soil C, N, P and Enzyme Activities to Biological Soil Crusts in China: A Meta-Analysis.

Zhi Yang, Yong Yuan, Jinjin Guo, Jinxi Li, Jianhua Li, Hu Yu, Wen Zeng, Yinhong Huang, Liyun Yin, Fulian Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Synergistic mitigation of lead accumulation in celery by magnesium polypeptide and microbially induced calcite precipitation in phosphate mining wasteland soils.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zhi YangFaculty of Modern Agricultural Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China.
Yong YuanFaculty of Modern Agricultural Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China.
Jinjin GuoFaculty of Modern Agricultural Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China.
Jinxi LiFaculty of Modern Agricultural Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China.
Jianhua LiFaculty of Modern Agricultural Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China.
Hu YuFaculty of Modern Agricultural Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China.
Wen ZengFaculty of Modern Agricultural Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China.
Yinhong HuangFaculty of Modern Agricultural Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China.
Liyun YinFaculty of Modern Agricultural Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China.
Fulian LiFaculty of Modern Agricultural Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China.

Funding

he National Natural Science Foundation of China 42207400he Yunnan Provincial Field Scientific Observation and Research Station on Water-Soil-Crop System in Seasonal Arid Region 202305AM070006the Natural Science Research Foundation of Kunming University of Science and Technology KKZ3202323005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological soil crusts (BSCs) are often referred to as the "living skin" of arid regions worldwide. Yet, the combined impact of BSCs on soil carbon (C), nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and enzyme activities remains not fully understood. This study identified, screened and reviewed 71 out of 2856 literature sources to assess the responses of soil C, N, P and enzyme activity to BSCs through a meta-analysis. The results indicated that BSC presence significantly increased soil C, N, P and soil enzyme activity, and this increasing effect was significantly influenced by the types of BSCs. Results from the overall effect showed that soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), available nitrogen (AN), total phosphorus (TP), and available phosphorus (AP) increased by 107.88%, 84.52%, 45.43%, 27.46%, and 54.71%, respectively, and four soil enzyme activities (Alkaline Phosphatase, Cellulase, Sucrase, and Urease) increased by 93.65-229.27%. The highest increases in SOC, TN and AN content occurred in the soil covered with lichen crusts and moss crusts, and significant increases in Alkaline Phosphatase and Cellulase were observed in the soil covered with moss crusts and mixed crusts, suggesting that moss crusts can synergistically enhance soil C and N pool and enzyme activity. Additionally, variations in soil C, N, P content, and enzyme activity were observed under different environmental settings, with more pronounced improvements seen in coarse and medium-textured soils compared to fine-textured soils, particularly at a depth of 5 cm from the soil surface. BSCs in desert ecosystems showed more significant increases in SOC, TN, AN, and Alkaline Phosphatase compared to forest and grassland ecosystems. Specifically, BSCs at low altitude (≤500 m) with an annual average rainfall of 0-400 mm and an annual average temperature ≤ 10 °C were the most conducive to improving soil C, N, and P levels. Our results highlight the role of BSCs and their type in increasing soil C, N, P and enzyme activities, with these effects significantly impacted by soil texture, ecosystem type, and climatic conditions. The implications of these findings are crucial for soil enhancement, ecosystem revitalization, windbreak, and sand stabilization efforts in the drylands of China.

Indexed as

BSCsenzyme activityinfluence factormeta-analysissoil nutrients

Identifiers

PMID38891333
PMCPMC11174547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.