Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38891203›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024

The Climate Change Worry Scale (CCWS) and Its Links with Demographics and Mental Health Outcomes in a Polish Sample.

Paweł Larionow, Magdalena Gawrych, Julia Mackiewicz, Maciej Michalak, Karolina Mudło-Głagolska, David A Preece, Alan E Stewart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Paweł LarionowFaculty of Psychology, Kazimierz Wielki University, 85-064 Bydgoszcz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4911-3984
Magdalena GawrychInstitute of Psychology, The Maria Grzegorzewska University, 02-353 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0668-5437
Julia MackiewiczFaculty of Psychology, Kazimierz Wielki University, 85-064 Bydgoszcz, Poland.ORCID 0009-0002-9158-6520
Maciej MichalakFaculty of Psychology, Kazimierz Wielki University, 85-064 Bydgoszcz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9147-5420
Karolina Mudło-GłagolskaFaculty of Psychology, Kazimierz Wielki University, 85-064 Bydgoszcz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8079-3781
David A PreeceFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1060-2024
Alan E StewartDepartment of Counseling and Human Development Services, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30677, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9737-6359

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developing valid and reliable measures of psychological responses to climate change is of high importance, as this facilitates our understanding of people's psychological responses, including their pro-environmental behavior. Recently, the Climate Change Worry Scale (CCWS) was introduced. This study aimed to develop the first Polish version of the CCWS and explore its psychometric properties. Our sample comprised 420 Polish adults aged 18-70, with a mean age of 26.20 (standard deviation = 10.61) years. The CCWS's factor structure was assessed with confirmatory factor analysis. McDonald's omega and Cronbach's alpha coefficients were computed to assess internal consistency reliability. Pearson correlations between climate change worry (CCW) and experience of climate change (i.e., an individual's level of perception of being affected by climate change), pro-environmental behavior, ill-being (i.e., anxiety and depression symptoms), and well-being were calculated. Our results support the strong factorial validity of the CCWS, conforming to its intended one-factor solution, with excellent internal consistency reliability for the total scale score (i.e., McDonald's omega and Cronbach's alpha values of 0.93). We noted large positive correlations between CCW and experiences of climate change, as well as pro-environmental behavior, and medium positive correlations with psychopathology symptoms. CCW scores were not associated with well-being. As the CCWS represents a measure of a specific manifestation of worry, we also examined its discriminant validity against more general psychological distress markers, and it evidenced strong validity in this regard. Overall, the Polish version of the CCWS appears to have strong psychometric properties, and will therefore be a useful tool to use in research on psychological responses to climate change.

Indexed as

climate anxietyclimate change worryeco-anxietyeco-emotionsenvironmental distressexperience of climate changemental healthpro-environmental behaviorpsychometric propertiessolastalgia

Identifiers

PMID38891203
PMCPMC11171471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.