Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38891187›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Toward Intraoperative Visual Intelligence: Real-Time Surgical Instrument Segmentation for Enhanced Surgical Monitoring.

Mostafa Daneshgar Rahbar, George Pappas, Nabih Jaber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mostafa Daneshgar RahbarDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Lawrence Technological University, Southfield, MI 48075, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5277-7135
George PappasDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Lawrence Technological University, Southfield, MI 48075, USA.
Nabih JaberDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Lawrence Technological University, Southfield, MI 48075, USA.

Funding

College of Engineering Research Seed Grant Program at Lawrence Technological University 0001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOpen surgery relies heavily on the surgeon's visual acuity and spatial awareness to track instruments within a dynamic and often cluttered surgical field.

methodsThis system utilizes a head-mounted depth camera to monitor surgical scenes, providing both image data and depth information. The video captured from this camera is scaled down, compressed using MPEG, and transmitted to a high-performance workstation via the RTSP (Real-Time Streaming Protocol), a reliable protocol designed for real-time media transmission. To segment surgical instruments, we utilize the enhanced U-Net with GridMask (EUGNet) for its proven effectiveness in surgical tool segmentation.

resultsFor rigorous validation, the system's performance reliability and accuracy are evaluated using prerecorded RGB-D surgical videos. This work demonstrates the potential of this system to improve situational awareness, surgical efficiency, and generate data-driven insights within the operating room. In a simulated surgical environment, the system achieves a high accuracy of 85.5% in identifying and segmenting surgical instruments. Furthermore, the wireless video transmission proves reliable with a latency of 200 ms, suitable for real-time processing.

conclusionsThese findings represent a promising step towards the development of assistive technologies with the potential to significantly enhance surgical practice.

Indexed as

computer visionconvolutional neural networkdata augmentationimage processingintraoperative surgerymonitoring surgical scenesurgical tools segmentationU-Net

Identifiers

PMID38891187
PMCPMC11171602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.