Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38891133›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Domains and Categories of Needs in Long-Term Follow-Up of Adult Cancer Survivors: A Scoping Review of Systematic Reviews.

Nicolas Sperisen, Dimitri Kohler, Nicole Steck, Pierre-Yves Dietrich, Elisabetta Rapiti

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nicolas SperisenInstitute of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0005-6541-0718
Dimitri KohlerSwiss Cancer League, 3001 Bern, Switzerland.
Nicole SteckSwiss Cancer League, 3001 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8689-716X
Pierre-Yves DietrichClinique des Grangettes, Hirslanden, 1224 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7375-6939
Elisabetta RapitiGeneva Cancer Registry, Institute of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7847-7728

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of long-term cancer survivors increases continually. Understanding their needs is crucial to ensure an adequate follow-up. The aim of our study was to summarize the current literature concerning needs and what influences these needs. A scoping review of systematic reviews was conducted according to the recommendations of the Joanna Briggs Institute. Four electronic databases were searched. Of 414 retrieved papers, 11 met the eligibility criteria. Needs were aggregated into six domains (health-related information, health system, mental, practical, relationship and physical) and 15 categories. The lack of adequate information and the lack of access and/or continuity of supportive care were the most prominent needs. Female gender, younger age, a low level of family and/or social support, and higher educational level were identified as risk factors. Employment and relationship status can affect the needs both in a positive and negative way. The weeks or months after the end of the treatments are particularly critical, and needs can be emphasized during this period. The experience of cancer could also lead to positive changes. The variety of needs affects the quality of life of cancer survivors. Needs assessments should be systematically provided to ensure a better awareness of health professionals and to allow an individual, holistic, and integrated follow-up.

Indexed as

Systematic Reviews as Topicassessmentcancer survivorsfollow-uphealth systeminformationneedssupportive care

Identifiers

PMID38891133
PMCPMC11172118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.