Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38890786›Full record

ArticleNursing open2024

How can we approach preoperative frailty and related factors in patients with cancer? A scoping review.

Misun Jeon, Sang Hwa Lee, Ji Yoon Jang, Sanghee Kim

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Misun JeonCollege of Nursing and Brain Korea 21 FOUR Project, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4851-5690
Sang Hwa LeeCollege of Nursing and Brain Korea 21 FOUR Project, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.
Ji Yoon JangCollege of Nursing and Brain Korea 21 FOUR Project, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.
Sanghee KimCollege of Nursing & Mo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9806-2757

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo identify factors related to preoperative frailty in patients with cancer and map the tools that measure frailty.

designA Scoping review.

methodsThis scoping review based on Arksey and O'Malley's framework. Articles from CINAHL, PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases published between January 2011 and April 2021. The searched keywords were concepts related to 'cancer', 'frailty' and 'measurement'.

resultsWhile 728 records were initially identified, 24 studies were eventually selected. Research on frailty was actively conducted between 2020 and 2021. Factors related to preoperative frailty were age (22.9%), sex (11.4%), body mass index (11.4%) and physical status indicators (54.3%). The most common result of preoperative frailty was postoperative complications (35.0%). 24 instruments were used to measure frailty. IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE: Selecting an appropriate preoperative frailty screening tool can help improve patient postoperative treatment outcomes. IMPACT: There are many instruments for assessing preoperative frailty, each evaluating a multi-dimensional feature. We identified the frailty screening tools used today, organized the factors that affect frailty, and explored the impact of frailty. Identifying and organizing frailty measurement tools will enable appropriate evaluation. REPORTING

methodPRISMA-ScR. PATIENT CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.

Indexed as

FrailtyNeoplasmsAgedFrail ElderlyGeriatric AssessmentHumansPostoperative ComplicationsPreoperative Periodfrailtymeasurementoncology nursingpatient with cancerquality indicatorsurgery

Identifiers

PMID38890786
PMCPMC11187855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.