ArticleBMC bioinformatics2024
EPI-Trans: an effective transformer-based deep learning model for enhancer promoter interaction prediction.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epigenetic research methods and animal models for intervertebral disc degeneration (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2026Review
- CT-TADB predicts TAD boundaries without Hi-C by integrating DNA sequences and epigenomic features.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Article
- UniChrom: a universal deep learning architecture for cross-scale chromatin interaction prediction.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Synthetic Biology Strategies for Activating Cryptic BGCs inACS omega · 2026Review
- EPINTLM: enhancer-promoter prediction with pretrained k-mer embeddings and residual cross-attention.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- A hybrid mamba-transformer architecture fusing clinical and genetic features for gestational diabetes mellitus prediction.PloS one · 2026Article
- Deep learning guided programmable design of Escherichia coli core promoters from sequence architecture to strength control.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Class-balanced negative training sets for improving classifier model predictions of enhancer-promoter interactions.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Leveraging hierarchical structures for genetic block interaction studies using the hierarchical transformer.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- DeepEPI: CNN-transformer-based model for extracting TF interactions through predicting enhancer-promoter interactions.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
- EPI-DynFusion: enhancer-promoter interaction prediction model based on sequence features and dynamic fusion mechanisms.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- GATv2EPI: Predicting Enhancer-Promoter Interactions with a Dynamic Graph Attention Network.Genes · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecognition of enhancer-promoter Interactions (EPIs) is crucial for human development. EPIs in the genome play a key role in regulating transcription. However, experimental approaches for classifying EPIs are too expensive in terms of effort, time, and resources. Therefore, more and more studies are being done on developing computational techniques, particularly using deep learning and other machine learning techniques, to address such problems. Unfortunately, the majority of current computational methods are based on convolutional neural networks, recurrent neural networks, or a combination of them, which don't take into consideration contextual details and the long-range interactions between the enhancer and promoter sequences. A new transformer-based model called EPI-Trans is presented in this study to overcome the aforementioned limitations. The multi-head attention mechanism in the transformer model automatically learns features that represent the long interrelationships between enhancer and promoter sequences. Furthermore, a generic model is created with transferability that can be utilized as a pre-trained model for various cell lines. Moreover, the parameters of the generic model are fine-tuned using a particular cell line dataset to improve performance.
resultsBased on the results obtained from six benchmark cell lines, the average AUROC for the specific, generic, and best models is 94.2%, 95%, and 95.7%, while the average AUPR is 80.5%, 66.1%, and 79.6% respectively.
conclusionsThis study proposed a transformer-based deep learning model for EPI prediction. The comparative results on certain cell lines show that EPI-Trans outperforms other cutting-edge techniques and can provide superior performance on the challenge of recognizing EPI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.