ArticleScientific reports2024
Research on machine learning forecasting and early warning model for rainfall-induced landslides in Yunnan province.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Research on the Application of Dynamic Process Correlation Based on Radar Data in Mine Slope Sliding Early Warning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Landslides are highly destructive geological disasters that pose a serious threat to the safety of people's lives and property. In this study, historical records of landslides in Yunnan Province, along with eight underlying factors of landslide (elevation, slope, aspect, lithology, land cover type, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), soil type, and average annual precipitation (AAP)), as well as historical rainfall and current rainfall data were utilized. Firstly, we analyzed the sensitivity of each underlying factor in the study area using the frequency ratio (FR) method and obtained a landslide susceptibility map (LSM). Then, we constructed a regional rainfall-induced landslides (RIL) probability forecasting model based on machine learning (ML) algorithms and divided warning levels. In order to construct a better RIL prediction model and explore the effects of different ML algorithms and input values of the underlying factor on the model, we compared five ML classification algorithms: extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR), and random forest (RF) algorithms and three representatives of the input values of the underlying factors. The results show that among the obtained forecasting models, the LSM-based RF model performs the best, with an accuracy (ACC) of 0.906, an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.954, a probability of detection (POD) of 0.96 in the test set, and a prediction accuracy of 0.8 in the validation set. Therefore, we recommend using RF-LSM model as the RIL forecasting model for Yunnan Province and dividing warning levels.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.