Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38890448›Full record

ArticleLeukemia2024

Pre-emptive detection and evolution of relapse in acute myeloid leukemia by flow cytometric measurable residual disease surveillance.

Nicholas McCarthy, Gege Gui, Florent Dumezy, Christophe Roumier, Georgia Andrew, Sarah Green, Madeleine Jenkins, Alexandra Adams, Naeem Khan, Charles Craddock and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Nicholas McCarthy *Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Gege Gui *Laboratory of Myeloid Malignancies, Hematology Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Florent DumezyLaboratory of Hematology, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France.
Christophe RoumierLaboratory of Hematology, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France.
Georgia AndrewLaboratory of Myeloid Malignancies, Hematology Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Sarah GreenInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Madeleine JenkinsImperial College, London, UK.
Alexandra AdamsUniversity of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0009-0004-6182-0173
Naeem KhanInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Charles CraddockClinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5041-6678
Christopher S HouriganLaboratory of Myeloid Malignancies, Hematology Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Adriana PlesaLyon University Hospital, CHU-HCL, Lyon Sud, Pierre Benite, France.
Sylvie FreemanInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. s.freeman@bham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1869-180X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measurable residual disease (MRD) surveillance in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) may identify patients destined for relapse and thus provide the option of pre-emptive therapy to improve their outcome. Whilst flow cytometric MRD (Flow-MRD) can be applied to high-risk AML/ myelodysplasia patients, its diagnostic performance for detecting impending relapse is unknown. We evaluated this in a cohort comprising 136 true positives (bone marrows preceding relapse by a median of 2.45 months) and 155 true negatives (bone marrows during sustained remission). At an optimal Flow-MRD threshold of 0.040%, clinical sensitivity and specificity for relapse was 74% and 87% respectively (51% and 98% for Flow-MRD ≥ 0.1%) by 'different-from-normal' analysis. Median relapse kinetics were 0.78 log

Indexed as

Flow CytometryLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteNeoplasm, ResidualAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansImmunophenotypingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisRecurrenceYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38890448
PMCPMC11286513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.