Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38890395›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Empowering artificial intelligence in characterizing the human primary pacemaker of the heart at single cell resolution.

Alexandru Chelu, Elizabeth J Cartwright, Halina Dobrzynski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexandru CheluDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. alexandru.chelu@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk.
Elizabeth J CartwrightDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Halina DobrzynskiDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/4yPhD/F/20/34131Fondation Leducq 19CV03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sinus node (SN) serves as the primary pacemaker of the heart and is the first component of the cardiac conduction system. Due to its anatomical properties and sample scarcity, the cellular composition of the human SN has been historically challenging to study. Here, we employed a novel deep learning deconvolution method, namely Bulk2space, to characterise the cellular heterogeneity of the human SN using existing single-cell datasets of non-human species. As a proof of principle, we used Bulk2Space to profile the cells of the bulk human right atrium using publicly available mouse scRNA-Seq data as a reference. 18 human cell populations were identified, with cardiac myocytes being the most abundant. Each identified cell population correlated to its published experimental counterpart. Subsequently, we applied the deconvolution to the bulk transcriptome of the human SN and identified 11 cell populations, including a population of pacemaker cardiomyocytes expressing pacemaking ion channels (HCN1, HCN4, CACNA1D) and transcription factors (SHOX2 and TBX3). The connective tissue of the SN was characterised by adipocyte and fibroblast populations, as well as key immune cells. Our work unravelled the unique single cell composition of the human SN by leveraging the power of a novel machine learning method.

Indexed as

Myocytes, CardiacSingle-Cell AnalysisSinoatrial NodeAnimalsArtificial IntelligenceDeep LearningHeart AtriaHumansMiceTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID38890395
PMCPMC11189420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.