Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38890321›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

A single-cell atlas of pig gastrulation as a resource for comparative embryology.

Luke Simpson, Andrew Strange, Doris Klisch, Sophie Kraunsoe, Takuya Azami, Daniel Goszczynski, Triet Le Minh, Benjamin Planells, Nadine Holmes, Fei Sang and 4 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Development of node architecture and emergence of molecular organizer characteristics in the pig embryo.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Current Status of Synthetic Mammalian Embryo Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Luke SimpsonSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Nottingham, LE12 5RD, UK.
Andrew StrangeSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Nottingham, LE12 5RD, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2004-150X
Doris KlischSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Nottingham, LE12 5RD, UK.
Sophie KraunsoeSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Nottingham, LE12 5RD, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1813-6670
Takuya AzamiMRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK.
Daniel GoszczynskiSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Nottingham, LE12 5RD, UK.
Triet Le MinhSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Nottingham, LE12 5RD, UK.
Benjamin PlanellsSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Nottingham, LE12 5RD, UK.
Nadine HolmesSchool of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Fei SangSchool of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Sonal HensonSchool of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2002-5462
Matthew LooseSchool of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5264-0929
Jennifer NicholsMRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK.
Ramiro AlberioSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Nottingham, LE12 5RD, UK. Ramiro.alberio@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6560-3919

Funding

RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/S000178/1RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/T013575/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell-fate decisions during mammalian gastrulation are poorly understood outside of rodent embryos. The embryonic disc of pig embryos mirrors humans, making them a useful proxy for studying gastrulation. Here we present a single-cell transcriptomic atlas of pig gastrulation, revealing cell-fate emergence dynamics, as well as conserved and divergent gene programs governing early porcine, primate, and murine development. We highlight heterochronicity in extraembryonic cell-types, despite the broad conservation of cell-type-specific transcriptional programs. We apply these findings in combination with functional investigations, to outline conserved spatial, molecular, and temporal events during definitive endoderm specification. We find early FOXA2 + /TBXT- embryonic disc cells directly form definitive endoderm, contrasting later-emerging FOXA2/TBXT+ node/notochord progenitors. Unlike mesoderm, none of these progenitors undergo epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Endoderm/Node fate hinges on balanced WNT and hypoblast-derived NODAL, which is extinguished upon endodermal differentiation. These findings emphasise the interplay between temporal and topological signalling in fate determination during gastrulation.

Indexed as

Embryo, MammalianEndodermGastrulationGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalSingle-Cell AnalysisAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineageEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionHepatocyte Nuclear Factor 3-betaMesodermMiceSwineT-Box Domain ProteinsTranscriptomeHepatocyte Nuclear Factor 3-betaT-Box Domain Proteins

Identifiers

PMID38890321
PMCPMC11189408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.