ArticleNature communications2024
Characterization and regulation of cell cycle-independent noncanonical gene targeting.
Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- dMMR killer: A conditional suicide gene that preferentially kills DNA mismatch repair-deficient cells.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2026Article
- Circular single stranded DNA potentiates non-viral gene insertion in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Gene editing and CRISPR-dependent homology-mediated end joining.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2025Review
- Homology-arm length of donor DNA affects the impact of Msh2 loss on homologous recombination-mediated gene targeting.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- HR eye & MMR eye: one-day assessment of DNA repair-defective tumors eligible for targeted therapy.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Homology-dependent targeted DNA integration, generally referred to as gene targeting, provides a powerful tool for precise genome modification; however, its fundamental mechanisms remain poorly understood in human cells. Here we reveal a noncanonical gene targeting mechanism that does not rely on the homologous recombination (HR) protein Rad51. This mechanism is suppressed by Rad52 inhibition, suggesting the involvement of single-strand annealing (SSA). The SSA-mediated gene targeting becomes prominent when DSB repair by HR or end-joining pathways is defective and does not require isogenic DNA, permitting 5% sequence divergence. Intriguingly, loss of Msh2, loss of BLM, and induction of a target-site DNA break all significantly and synergistically enhance SSA-mediated targeted integration. Most notably, SSA-mediated integration is cell cycle-independent, occurring in the G1 phase as well. Our findings provide unequivocal evidence for Rad51-independent targeted integration and unveil multiple mechanisms to regulate SSA-mediated targeted as well as random integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.