Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38889779›Full record

ReviewProceedings. Biological sciences2024

Lorenz's classic 'baby schema': a useful biological concept?

Yuri Kawaguchi, Bridget M Waller

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Lorenz's classic 'baby schema': a useful biological concept?Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yuri KawaguchiCentre for Interdisciplinary Research on Social Interaction, School of Social Sciences, Nottingham Trent University , Nottingham NG1 4FQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6682-4964
Bridget M WallerCentre for Interdisciplinary Research on Social Interaction, School of Social Sciences, Nottingham Trent University , Nottingham NG1 4FQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6303-7458

Funding

British AcademyBritish Academy NIF22/220105NTUNTU Psychology
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Konrad Lorenz introduced the concept of a 'baby schema', suggesting that infants have specific physical features, such as a relatively large head, large eyes and protruding cheeks, which function as an innate releaser to promote caretaking motivation from perceivers. Over the years, a large body of research has been conducted on the baby schema. However, there are two critical problems underpinning the current literature. First, the term 'baby schema' lacks consistency among researchers. Some researchers use the term baby schema to refer to infant stimuli (often faces) in comparison with adults (

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionFaceHumansInfantattractiveness'baby schema'cutenessfacesKonrad Lorenz

Identifiers

PMID38889779
PMCPMC11285920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.