ArticleBiomolecules & biomedicine2024
Unveiling the link between ACR TI-RADS grading and Bethesda score of thyroid nodules in diabetic patients: A comprehensive analysis.
Article in Biomolecules & biomedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to explores the factors influencing thyroid nodules (TNs) in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and evaluates the consistency between different American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) grades and Bethesda scores. Total of 642 T2DM patients were divided into TN group (245) and control group (397) based on the presence or absence of TNs. TN patients were further categorized into ACR TI-RADS classification (TR) 1 to 4 and TR5 subgroups. Diabetes-related clinical and biochemical parameters were collected, and differences were analyzed using univariate analysis. Logistic regression analysis was utilized to pinpoint independent influencing factors for TN occurrence and different TN classifications. Consequently, age, body mass index (BMI), fasting plasma glucose level (FBGL), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), diabetic progression, and family history of TNs emerged as independent risk factors for TN development in T2DM patients. Additionally, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), nodule diameter, and family history of TNs were identified as independent risk factors for TR5 TN development in T2DM patients. All TR1 to 2 nodules had a Bethesda score of 2 and all showed benign pathological findings. In 97.10% of cases (67/69), nodules classified as TR3 exhibited a Bethesda score of 2, with all pathological results indicating benign findings, aligning with the Bethesda score. In addition, the concordance between TR4 nodules and Bethesda score was only 78.57% (88/112). In conclusion, TNs and their malignancy in T2DM patients are significantly linked to blood glucose and lipid metabolism indexes. TR3 classification in T2DM patients poses a low malignancy risk, suggesting caution when conducting fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.