ArticleFly2024
Conserved A-to-I RNA editing with non-conserved recoding expands the candidates of functional editing sites.
Article in Fly, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Promiscuous RNA editing in lncRNARNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Signal peptides restrict genome evolution and A-to-I RNA editing.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Systematic revelation and meditation on the significance of long exons using representative eukaryotic genomes.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- A-to-I-edited miR-1251-5p restrains tumor growth and metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma through regulating TCF7-mediated Wnt signaling pathway.Discover oncology · 2024Article
- Adaptive evolution of A-to-I auto-editing site in Adar of eusocial insects.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Learning from the Codon Table: Convergent Recoding Provides Novel Understanding on the Evolution of A-to-I RNA Editing.Journal of molecular evolution · 2024Article
- Host-dependent C-to-U RNA editing in SARS-CoV-2 creates novel viral genes with optimized expressibility.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024Article
- An orthology-based methodology as a complementary approach to retrieve evolutionarily conserved A-to-I RNA editing sites.RNA biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing recodes the genome and confers flexibility for the organisms to adapt to the environment. It is believed that RNA recoding sites are well suited for facilitating adaptive evolution by increasing the proteomic diversity in a temporal-spatial manner. The function and essentiality of a few conserved recoding sites are recognized. However, the experimentally discovered functional sites only make up a small corner of the total sites, and there is still the need to expand the repertoire of such functional sites with bioinformatic approaches. In this study, we define a new category of RNA editing sites termed 'conserved editing with non-conserved recoding' and systematically identify such sites in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.