Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38889167›Full record

SynthesisEnvironmental health perspectives2024

Exposome-Wide Association Study of Body Mass Index Using a Novel Meta-Analytical Approach for Random Forest Models.

Haykanush Ohanyan, Mark van de Wiel, Lützen Portengen, Alfred Wagtendonk, Nicolette R den Braver, Trynke R de Jong, Monique Verschuren, Katja van den Hurk, Karien Stronks, Eric Moll van Charante and 18 more

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Environmental health perspectives, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Global research trends on the human exposome: a bibliometric analysis (2005-2024).Environmental science and pollution research international · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Haykanush OhanyanInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8591-3324
Mark van de WielDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Lützen PortengenInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Alfred WagtendonkInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Nicolette R den BraverDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Trynke R de JongLifelines Cohort & Biobank, Roden, the Netherlands.
Monique VerschurenJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Katja van den HurkDonor Medicine Research - Donor Studies, Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Karien StronksDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Eric Moll van CharanteDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Natasja M van SchoorDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Coen D A StehouwerSchool for Cardiovascular Diseases (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Anke WesseliusSchool for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Annemarie KosterCare and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Margreet Ten HaveTrimbos-Instituut, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Brenda W J H PenninxDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Marieke F van WierDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, section Ear and Hearing, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Irina MotocDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Albertine J OldehinkelInterdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation (ICPE), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Gonneke WillemsenDepartment of Biological Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Dorret I BoomsmaDepartment of Biological Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Mariëlle A BeenackersDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7981-3391
Anke HussInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Martin van BoxtelDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNs), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Gerard HoekInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Joline W J BeulensDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Roel VermeulenInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Jeroen LakerveldInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOverweight and obesity impose a considerable individual and social burden, and the urban environments might encompass factors that contribute to obesity. Nevertheless, there is a scarcity of research that takes into account the simultaneous interaction of multiple environmental factors.

objectivesOur objective was to perform an exposome-wide association study of body mass index (BMI) in a multicohort setting of 15 studies.

methodsStudies were affiliated with the Dutch Geoscience and Health Cohort Consortium (GECCO), had different population sizes (688-141,825), and covered the entire Netherlands. Ten studies contained general population samples, others focused on specific populations including people with diabetes or impaired hearing. BMI was calculated from self-reported or measured height and weight. Associations with 69 residential neighborhood environmental factors (air pollution, noise, temperature, neighborhood socioeconomic and demographic factors, food environment, drivability, and walkability) were explored. Random forest (RF) regression addressed potential nonlinear and nonadditive associations. In the absence of formal methods for multimodel inference for RF, a rank aggregation-based meta-analytic strategy was used to summarize the results across the studies.

resultsSix exposures were associated with BMI: five indicating neighborhood economic or social environments (average home values, percentage of high-income residents, average income, livability score, share of single residents) and one indicating the physical activity environment (walkability in DISCUSSION: Rank aggregation made it possible to flexibly combine the results from various studies, although between-study heterogeneity could not be estimated quantitatively based on RF models. Neighborhood social, economic, and physical environments had the strongest associations with BMI. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP13393.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexEnvironmental ExposureExposomeCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleNetherlandsObesityRandom ForestResidence Characteristics

Identifiers

PMID38889167
PMCPMC11218701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.