Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38889140›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Effects of Non-Invasive Ventilation with different modalities in patients undergoing heart surgery: Protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Eder Rodrigues Araújo, Ivan Daniel Bezerra Nogueira, Paulo Eduardo E Silva Barbosa, Patrícia Angélica de Miranda Silva Nogueira

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05966337 (Effects of Non-invasive Ventilation With Different Modalities in Patients Undergoing Heart Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05966337 naunknown statusnot on this map

Effects of Non-invasive Ventilation With Different Modalities in Patients Undergoing Heart Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do NorteRan2023 to 2024Enrolled62ConditionsCardiac Surgical Procedures, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, BIPAP Biphasic Intermittent Positive Airway PressureArmsCPAP, BIPAP, Usual care in phisicaltherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eder Rodrigues AraújoPostgraduate Program in Physiotherapy (PPGFIS), Laboratory of Measures and Evaluation in Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8909-2110
Ivan Daniel Bezerra NogueiraDepartment of Physical Therapy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Paulo Eduardo E Silva BarbosaCenter of Technology Strategies in Health, State University of Paraiba, Campina Grande, Brazil.
Patrícia Angélica de Miranda Silva NogueiraDepartment of Physical Therapy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3763-2410

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe thoracic surgical procedure leads to a reduction in respiratory muscle strength. To restore it, certain strategies must be employed. Physiotherapy utilizes resources and techniques such as deep breathing stimulation, cough stimulation, use of incentive spirometers, mobilization, and ambulation. However, at times these resources and techniques may prove insufficient, and additional measures, such as Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV), are employed Pieczkoski (2017). Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation (NPPV) has been utilized to expedite pulmonary function recovery as well as to prevent and treat postoperative pulmonary complications Nasrala 2018. NIV diminishes the risk of ventilator-associated complications due to its non-invasive nature. Consequently, NIV has been adopted to avert post-extubation complications in postoperative patients Liu 2020. The objective of this study is to conduct a randomized clinical trial and assess the efficacy of NIV in comparison to conventional physiotherapy in terms of pulmonary function among patients undergoing cardiac surgery at a selected hospital in Campina Grande, Paraíba, Brazil. METHODS AND ANALYSES: This randomized, controlled, double-blind (patient and analyst) clinical trial will be conducted at Hospital João XXIII in Campina Grande, Paraíba, Brazil. Patients do not know which group they are allocated to. Those in the group that use CPAP or BIPAP will not be able to distinguish one from the other. The data analyst at the end of the collections will also be blinded. Only the health professional who will be applying the protocol cannot be blinded. The sample size, determined via sample calculation, yielded a total of 21 patients per group (63 patients). The patients will be allocated into 3 groups (CPAP group - CPAP + standard physiotherapy, BiPAP group - BiPAP + standard physiotherapy, and Control group - standard physiotherapy) in a 1:1:1 allocation ratio. The control group will receive the usual physiotherapeutic treatment as per the kinesiotherapy protocol. The treatment will be administered twice daily, starting in the ICU and progressing to the ward. In the CPAP group, nasal CPAP at 10cmH2O will be administered for 1 hour, twice daily, using an approved device. In the BiPAP group, nasal BiPAP with an IPAP of 13cmH2O and EPAP of 8cmH2O will be administered for 1 hour, twice daily, using an approved device. The NIV sessions will be conducted over the course of 5 days of hospitalization, both in the ICU and the ward. Assessments will be conducted at two time points: on day 1 preoperatively and on day 5 postoperatively. The following measures will be evaluated: pulmonary function, length of hospital stay, presence of postoperative pulmonary complications, score of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) in its Portuguese version, functional capacity, the Global Perception of Change Scale, and the Functional Independence Measure (MIF). The normality of variables will be assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. IBM SPSS Statistics Base 25.0, using the Shapiro-Wilk test for normality and paired Student's t-test for pre-post intervention comparison. They will use linear mixed effects models for longitudinal analysis and GLMMs to compare NIV effects over time between groups. They will employ ITT for missing data, INAR models for time dependence, fixed effects models for endogeneity, and Cohen's d for effect sizes. Parametric model assumptions will be checked, and various models will be considered for data characteristics. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: Pulmonary function, Length of hospital stay. SECOND OUTCOMES: Score of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) in Portuguese version, Funcional capacity, The global perception of change scale, The functional independence measure (MIF), pO2 (partial pressure of oxygen), pCO2 (partial pressure of carbon dioxide), HCO3 (bicarbonate), Arterial Oxygen Saturation (SaO2), Base Excess (BE), Presence of lung complications. OTHER PRE-SPECIFIED OUTCOMES: Duration of cardiopulmonary bypass, type of surgery, personal history, preoperative ejection fraction, previous respiratory complications, body mass index (BMI), gender and age.

trial registrationTrial register number NCT05966337.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresNoninvasive VentilationBrazilDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMalePhysical Therapy ModalitiesPostoperative ComplicationsRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID38889140
PMCPMC11185470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.