Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38889114›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Retinal prosthesis edge detection (RPED) algorithm: Low-power and improved visual acuity strategy for artificial retinal implants.

Yeonji Oh, Jonggi Hong, Jungsuk Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yeonji OhDepartment of Medical Science, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0009-0002-3014-5115
Jonggi HongDepartment of Health Sciences & Technology, Gachon Advanced Institute for Health Sciences & Technology, Gachon University, Incheon, South Korea.
Jungsuk KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Gachon University, Sungnam, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5866-465X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper proposes a retinal prosthesis edge detection (RPED) algorithm that can achieve high visual acuity and low power. Retinal prostheses have been used to stimulate retinal tissue by injecting charge via an electrode array, thereby artificially restoring the vision of visually impaired patients. The retinal prosthetic chip, which generates biphasic current pulses, should be located in the foveal area measuring 5 mm × 5 mm. When a high-density stimulation pixel array is realized in a limited area, the distance between the stimulation pixels narrows, resulting in current dispersion and high-power dissipation related to heat generation. Various edge detection methods have been proposed over the past decade to reduce these deleterious effects and achieve high-resolution pixels. However, conventional methods have the disadvantages of high-power consumption and long data processing times because many pixels are activated to detect edges. In this study, we propose a novel RPED algorithm that has a higher visual acuity and less power consumption despite using fewer active pixels than existing techniques. To verify the performance of the devised RPED algorithm, the peak signal-to-noise ratio and structural similarity index map, which evaluates the quantitative numerical value of the image are employed and compared with the Sobel, Canny, and past edge detection algorithms in MATLAB. Finally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed RPED algorithm using a 1600-pixel retinal stimulation chip fabricated using a 0.35 μm complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor process.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsVisual AcuityVisual ProsthesisHumansRetinaSignal-To-Noise Ratio

Identifiers

PMID38889114
PMCPMC11185494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.