Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38888923›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2024

Layperson-Delivered Telephone-Based Behavioral Activation Among Low-Income Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The HEAL-HOA Randomized Clinical Trial.

Jojo Yan Yan Kwok, Da Jiang, Dannii Yuen-Lan Yeung, Namkee G Choi, Rainbow Tin Hung Ho, Lisa Marie Warner, Kee-Lee Chou

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jojo Yan Yan KwokSchool of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
Da JiangDepartment of Special Education and Counselling, The Education University of Hong Kong, Tai Po, Hong Kong.
Dannii Yuen-Lan YeungDepartment of Social and Behavioural Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong.
Namkee G ChoiSteve Hicks School of Social Work, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Rainbow Tin Hung HoCentre on Behavioral Health, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
Lisa Marie WarnerDepartment of Psychology, MSB Medical School Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Kee-Lee ChouDepartment of Social Sciences and Policy Studies, The Education University of Hong Kong, Tai Po, Hong Kong.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Older adults are particularly vulnerable to loneliness and its physical and psychosocial sequelae, but scalable interventions are lacking, especially during disasters such as pandemics. Objective: To compare the effects of layperson-delivered, telephone-based behavioral activation and mindfulness interventions vs telephone-based befriending on loneliness among at-risk older adults. Design, Setting, and Participants: This assessor-blinded, 3-arm randomized clinical trial screened Chinese older adults through household visits and community referrals from April 1, 2021, to April 30, 2023, in Hong Kong. Eligible participants (≥65 years of age) who were lonely, digitally excluded, living alone, and living below the poverty line and provided consent to participate were randomized into behavioral activation, mindfulness, and befriending groups. Assessments were conducted at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months. Intervention: As part of the Helping Alleviate Loneliness in Hong Kong Older Adults (HEAL-HOA) dual randomized clinical trial, 148 older laypersons were trained to deliver a twice-weekly 30-minute intervention via telephone for 4 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was loneliness measured by the UCLA Loneliness Scale (range, 20-80) and the De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale (range, 0-6), with higher scores on both scales indicating greater loneliness. Secondary outcomes were depression, perceived stress, life satisfaction, psychological well-being, sleep quality, perceived social support, and social network. Results: A total of 1151 participants (mean [SD] age, 76.6 [7.8] years; 843 [73.2%] female) were randomized to the behavioral activation (n = 335), mindfulness (n = 460) or befriending (n = 356) group. Most were widowed or divorced (932 [81.0%]), had primary education or below (782 [67.9%]), and had 3 or more chronic diseases (505 [43.9%]). Following intention-to-treat principles, linear mixed-effects regression model analyses showed that loneliness measured by the UCLA Loneliness Scale was significantly reduced in the behavioral activation group (mean difference [MD], -1.96 [95% CI, -3.16 to -0.77] points; P < .001]) and in the mindfulness group (MD, -1.49 [95% CI, -2.60 to -0.37] points; P = .004) at 3 months compared with befriending. Loneliness measured by the De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale was not significantly reduced at 3 months in the behavioral activation group (MD, -0.06 [95% CI, -0.26 to 0.13] points; P > .99]) but was in the mindfulness group (MD, 0.22 [95% CI, 0.03 to 0.40] points; P = .01) at 3 months compared with befriending. In the behavioral activation and mindfulness groups, sleep quality improved compared with befriending, but perceived stress increased. Psychological well-being and perceived social support improved in the behavioral activation group. No statistically significant between-group differences were observed in depression, life satisfaction, or social network. Conclusion and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, scalable psychosocial interventions delivered remotely by older laypersons appeared promising in reducing later life loneliness and addressing the pressing mental health challenges faced by aging populations and professional geriatric mental health workforce shortages. Further research should explore ways to maximize the clinical relevance and cost-effectiveness of these interventions. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2300072909.

Indexed as

COVID-19LonelinessPovertyTelephoneAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHong KongHumansMaleMindfulnessPandemicsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID38888923
PMCPMC11185980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.