Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38888901›Full record

ArticleExperimental physiology2024

Characterising sex-related differences in lower- and higher-threshold motor unit behaviour through high-density surface electromyography.

Edoardo Lecce, Alessandra Conti, Stefano Nuccio, Francesco Felici, Ilenia Bazzucchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A question of rate? Girl-women differences in motor unit firing rate.European journal of applied physiology · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Edoardo LecceDepartment of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, Laboratory of Exercise Physiology, University of Rome 'Foro Italico', Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2936-9456
Alessandra ContiDepartment of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, Laboratory of Exercise Physiology, University of Rome 'Foro Italico', Rome, Italy.
Stefano NuccioDepartment of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, Laboratory of Exercise Physiology, University of Rome 'Foro Italico', Rome, Italy.
Francesco FeliciDepartment of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, Laboratory of Exercise Physiology, University of Rome 'Foro Italico', Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7228-9064
Ilenia BazzucchiDepartment of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, Laboratory of Exercise Physiology, University of Rome 'Foro Italico', Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6017-1683

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emerging questions in neuromuscular physiology revolve around whether males and females share similar neural control in diverse tasks across a broad range of intensities. In order to explore these features, high-density electromyography was used to record the myoelectrical activity of biceps brachii during trapezoidal isometric contractions at 35% and 70% of maximal voluntary force (MVF) on 11 male and 13 female participants. Identified motor units were then classified as lower-threshold (recruited at ≤30%MVF) and higher-threshold (recruited at >30%MVF). The discharge rate, interspike interval variability, recruitment and derecruitment thresholds, and estimates of neural drive to motor neurons were assessed. Female lower-threshold motor units showed higher neural drive (P < 0.001), accompanied by higher discharge rate at recruitment (P = 0.006), plateau (P = 0.001) and derecruitment (P = 0.001). On the other hand, male higher-threshold motor units showed greater neural drive (P = 0.04), accompanied by higher discharge rate at recruitment (P = 0.005), plateau (P = 0.04) and derecruitment (P = 0.01). Motor unit discharge rate normalised by the recruitment threshold was significantly higher in female lower-threshold motor units (P < 0.001), while no differences were observed in higher-threshold motor units. Recruitment and derecruitment thresholds are higher in males across all intensities (P < 0.01). However, males and females have similar activation and deactivation strategies, as evidenced by similar recruitment-to-derecruitment ratios (P > 0.05). This study encompasses a broad intensity range to analyse motor unit sex-related differences, highlighting higher neural drive and discharge rates in female lower-threshold motor units, elevated recruitment and derecruitment thresholds in males, and convergences in activation and deactivation strategies. HIGHLIGHTS: What is the central question of the study? Do male and female motor units behave similarly in low- and high-intensity contractions? What is the main finding and its importance? Female motor units show higher discharge rates in low-intensity tasks and lower discharge rates in high-intensity tasks, with no differences in recruitment behaviour. A broader inter-spike interval variability was also observed in females. These findings underline that there are sex-specific differences concern the firing strategies based on task intensity.

Indexed as

ElectromyographyIsometric ContractionMotor NeuronsMuscle, SkeletalRecruitment, NeurophysiologicalAction PotentialsAdultFemaleHumansMaleSex CharacteristicsSex FactorsYoung Adultcentral nervous systemelectromyogramHDsEMGmotor controlmotor unitskeletal muscle

Identifiers

PMID38888901
PMCPMC11291872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.