Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38888790›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2024

Surgical management of chest injuries in patients with multiple and/or severe trauma- a systematic review and clinical practice guideline update.

C Schreyer, S Schulz-Drost, A Markewitz, J Breuing, B Prediger, L Becker, C Spering, J Neudecker, B Thiel, D Bieler

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

C SchreyerDepartment of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, German Armed Forces Central Hospital, Koblenz, Germany.
S Schulz-DrostDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Schwerin Helios Hospital, Schwerin and Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Schwerin, Germany.
A MarkewitzGerman Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Berlin, Germany.
J BreuingInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany.
B PredigerInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany.
L BeckerDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany.
C SperingDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedics, and Plastic Surgery, Göttingen University Medical Centre, Göttingen, Germany.
J NeudeckerDepartment of Surgery, Berlin Charité Hospital, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow, Berlin, Germany.
B ThielDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Klinikum Westfalen Knappschaft, Lünen, Germany.
D BielerDepartment for Trauma Surgery and Orthopaedics, Reconstructive Surgery, Hand Surgery, Burn Medicine, German Armed Forces Central Hospital, Koblenz, Germany. Dan.Bieler@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOur aim was to update evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations for the surgical and interventional management of blunt or penetrating injuries to the chest in patients with multiple and/or severe injuries on the basis of current evidence. This guideline topic is part of the 2022 update of the German Guideline on the Treatment of Patients with Multiple and/or Severe Injuries.

methodsMEDLINE and Embase were systematically searched to May and June 2021 respectively for the update and new questions. Further literature reports were obtained from clinical experts. Randomised controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, cross-sectional studies and comparative registry studies were included if they compared interventions for the surgical management of injuries to the chest in patients with multiple and/or severe injuries. We considered patient-relevant clinical outcomes such as mortality, length of stay, and diagnostic test accuracy. Risk of bias was assessed using NICE 2012 checklists. The evidence was synthesised narratively, and expert consensus was used to develop recommendations and determine their strength.

resultsOne study was identified. This study compared wedge resection, lobectomy and pneumonectomy in the management of patients with severe chest trauma that required some form of lung resection. Based on the updated evidence and expert consensus, one recommendation was modified and two additional good practice points were developed. All achieved strong consensus. The recommendation on the amount of blood loss that is used as an indication for surgical intervention in patients with chest injuries was modified to reflect new findings in trauma care and patient stabilisation. The new good clinical practice points (GPPs) on the use of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in patients with initial circulatory stability are also in line with current practice in patient care.

conclusionAs has been shown in recent decades, the treatment of chest trauma has become less and less invasive for the patient as diagnostic and technical possibilities have expanded. Examples include interventional stenting of aortic injuries, video-assisted thoracoscopy and parenchyma-sparing treatment of lung injuries. These less invasive treatment concepts reduce morbidity and mortality in the primary surgical phase following a chest trauma.

Indexed as

Thoracic InjuriesHumansMultiple TraumaPractice Guidelines as TopicWounds, NonpenetratingWounds, PenetratingChestLung injuryPolytrauma guidelineSurgical managementThoracic aortic ruptureTracheobronchial injuryVATS in thoracic trauma

Identifiers

PMID38888790
PMCPMC11599403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.