Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38888779›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Intravital Microscopy for Imaging and Live Cell Tracking of Alveolar Macrophages in Real Time.

Ashley Kwak, Ajitha Thanabalasuriar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ashley KwakSchool of Biomedical Sciences Pharmacology & Therapeutics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Ajitha ThanabalasuriarSchool of Biomedical Sciences Pharmacology & Therapeutics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. Ajitha.thanabalasuriar@mail.mcgill.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classic in vitro coculture assays of pathogens with host cells have contributed significantly to our understanding of the intracellular lifestyle of several pathogens. Coculture assays with pathogens and eukaryotic cells can be analyzed through various techniques including plating for colony-forming units (CFU), confocal microscopy, and flow cytometry. However, findings from in vitro assays require validation in an in vivo model. Several physiological conditions can influence host-pathogen interactions, which cannot easily be mimicked in vitro. Intravital microscopy (IVM) is emerging as a powerful tool for studying host-pathogen interactions by enabling in vivo imaging of living organisms. As a result, IVM has significantly enhanced the understanding of infection mediated by diverse pathogens. The versatility of IVM has also allowed for the imaging of various organs as sites of local infection. This chapter specifically focuses on IVM conducted on the lung for elucidating pulmonary immune response, primarily involving alveolar macrophages, to pathogens. Additionally, in this chapter we outline the protocol for lung IVM that utilizes a thoracic suction window to stabilize the lung for acquiring stable images.

Indexed as

Cell TrackingIntravital MicroscopyMacrophages, AlveolarAnimalsHost-Pathogen InteractionsLungMiceFluorescent labelingHost-pathogen interactionsIntravital microscopyIn vivo imagingPulmonary immunityThoracic suction window

Identifiers

PMID38888779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.