Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38888723›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2024

One-Stop-Shop Cancer Screening Clinic: Acceptability Testing.

Jeannie M Au, Jamilia R Sly, Leah C Savage, Matthew Beyrouty, Neil S Calman, Michaela Frazier, Jay Musella, Francesca Minardi, Lina H Jandorf, Ellerie Weber and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jeannie M AuDepartment of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Health, New York, NY, USA.
Jamilia R SlyDepartment of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Health, New York, NY, USA.
Leah C SavageDepartment of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Health, New York, NY, USA.
Matthew BeyroutyDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Health, New York, NY, USA.
Neil S CalmanDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Health, New York, NY, USA.
Michaela FrazierInstitute for Family Health, New York, NY, USA.
Jay MusellaInstitute for Family Health, New York, NY, USA.
Francesca MinardiDepartment of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Health, New York, NY, USA.
Lina H JandorfDepartment of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Health, New York, NY, USA.
Ellerie WeberDepartment of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Health, New York, NY, USA.
Saborny MahmudIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Sarah J MillerDepartment of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Health, New York, NY, USA. sarah.miller@mssm.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6805-2216

Funding

Conduits: Mount Sinai Health System Translational Science HubUL1TR004419 · NCATS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Rosalind J Wright · 2022 to 2026
$46.4M
THE TISCH CANCER INSTITUTE - CANCER CENTER SUPPORT GRANTP30CA196521 · NCI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Deanna L Benson · 2015 to 2026
$35.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR004419NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR004419NCI NIH HHS P30 CA196521
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer screenings aid in the early detection of cancer and can help reduce cancer-related mortality. The current model of care for cancer screening is often siloed, based on the targeted cancer site. We tested the acceptability of a new model of care, called the One-Stop-Shop Cancer Screening Clinic, that centralizes cancer screenings and offers patients the option to complete all their recommended cancer screenings within one to two visits. We administered surveys to 59 community members and 26 healthcare providers to gather feedback about the One-Stop-Shop model of care. Both community members and providers identified potential benefits (e.g., decreased patient burden, increased completion of cancer screenings) and also potential challenges (e.g., challenges with workflow and timing of care) of the model of care. The results of the study support the acceptability of the model of care. Of the community members surveyed, 89.5% said, if offered, they would be interested in participating in the One-Stop-Shop Cancer Screening Clinic. Future studies are needed to formally evaluate the impact and cost effectiveness of the One-Stop-Shop Cancer Screening Clinic.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerNeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesAcceptabilityCancer screeningEarly detectionSystem-level intervention

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.