Observational studyClinical and experimental nephrology2024
A comparison of the clinical efficacy of tonsillectomy with steroid pulse therapy and tonsillectomy therapy alone for patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy: a retrospective observational study.
Observational study in Clinical and experimental nephrology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- IgA Nephropathy: Mechanisms, Risk Stratification, and Precision Therapy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Tonsillar Tfh cells contribute to the pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy in collaboration with memory B cells.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTonsillectomy with steroid pulse therapy (TSP) and tonsillectomy monotherapy (T) have improved the prognosis of patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN). However, a consensus has not been reached on the best treatment for these patients. This study aimed to compare the efficacies of TSP and T.
methodsData of patients with IgAN who received TSP or T were retrospectively analyzed. The exclusion criterion was a serum creatinine level > 1.5 mg/dL. The clinical remission and renal survival rates were compared.
resultsPatients were divided into groups based on the treatment method: the TSP (n = 82) and T groups (n = 41). No significant differences were observed in patient characteristics, except for the observation period (TSP: 60 months, T: 113 months). The log-rank test revealed that the clinical remission rate was significantly higher in the TSP group than in the T group (p < 0.05). The superiority of TSP was also observed in the urinary protein excretion (> / = or < 1 g/day) of the two subgroups. According to the Cox proportional-hazards model, the treatment method and daily urinary protein extraction were independent factors affecting clinical remission. The 10-year renal survival rates in the TSP and T groups were 100% and 92.5%, respectively. The log-rank test revealed a tendency for a higher renal survival rate in the TSP group than in the T group (p = 0.09).
conclusionThe clinical remission rate was significantly higher with TSP than with T, regardless of urinary protein levels. TSP tended to have a better renal survival rate than T.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38888720What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.