ArticleAging2024
Identification of a signature of histone modifiers in kidney renal clear cell carcinoma.
Article in Aging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A manganese metabolism-related gene signature stratifies prognosis and immunotherapy efficacy in kidney cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC) is a cancer that is closely associated with epigenetic alterations, and histone modifiers (HMs) are closely related to epigenetic regulation. Therefore, this study aimed to comprehensively explore the function and prognostic value of HMs-based signature in KIRC. HMs were first obtained from top journal. Then, the mRNA expression profiles and clinical information in KIRC samples were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets. Cox regression analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) analysis were implemented to find prognosis-related HMs and construct a risk model related to the prognosis in KIRC. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine prognostic differences between high- and low-risk groups. Immune infiltration and drug sensitivity analysis were also performed between high- and low-risk groups. Eventually, 8 HMs were successfully identified for the construction of a risk model in KIRC. The results of the correlation analysis between risk signature and the prognosis showed HMs-based signature has good prognostic value in KIRC. Results of immune analysis of risk models showed there were significant differences in the level of immune cell infiltration and expression of immune checkpoints between high- and low-risk groups. The results of the drug sensitivity analysis showed that the high-risk group was more sensitive to several chemotherapeutic agents such as Sunitinib, Tipifarnib, Nilotinib and Bosutinib than the low-risk group. In conclusion, we successfully constructed HMs-based prognostic signature that can predict the prognosis of KIRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.