ArticleJournal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA2024
Biomechanical evaluation of 3D-printed joint-type orthosis for hallux valgus.
Article in Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOrthoses play an important role in the conservative treatment of hallux valgus (HV) with different therapeutic effects. In this study, a new HV orthosis was developed using three-dimensional (3D) printing technology. In addition, its kinematic effect was evaluated using motion analysis.
methodsSeventeen participants with an HV angle of >20° were included in the study. The first metatarsophalangeal abduction angle before and after the orthosis was measured statically. Subsequently, dynamic first metatarsophalangeal abduction, dorsiflexion angle and ground reaction force with and without the orthosis were recorded and calculated during walking using a Vicon motion analysis system and force plates. The patients' comfort scales were determined after the motion analysis.
resultsThe angular corrections of the orthosis in the first metatarsophalangeal abduction were 14.6° and 6.3° under static and dynamic conditions, respectively. Reduced hallux dorsiflexion was observed with the orthosis in the early stance phase. However, no significant changes in ground reaction forces were observed.
conclusionThe results of our study confirm the potential of the 3D-printed HV orthosis in the static and dynamic correction of deformities while ensuring patient comfort with minimal impact on hallux kinematics, suggesting the potential of our design for long-term use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.