ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2024
How arginine inhibits substrate-binding domain 2 elucidated using molecular dynamics simulations.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The substrate-binding domain 2 (SBD2) is an important part of the bacterial glutamine (GLN) transporter and mediates binding and delivery of GLN to the transporter translocation subunit. The SBD2 consists of two domains, D1 and D2, that bind GLN in the space between domains in a closed structure. In the absence of ligand, the SBD2 adopts an open conformation with larger space between domains. The GLN binding and closing are essential for the subsequent transport into the cell. Arginine (ARG) can also bind to SBD2 but does not induce closing and inhibits GLN transport. We use atomistic molecular dynamics (MD) simulations in explicit solvent to study ARG binding in the presence of the open SBD2 structure and observed reversible binding to the native GLN binding site with similar contacts but no transition to a closed SBD2 state. Absolute binding free energy simulations predict a considerable binding affinity of ARG and GLN to the binding site on the D1 domain. Free energy simulations to induce subsequent closing revealed a strong free energy penalty in case of ARG binding in contrast to GLN binding that favors the closed SBD2 state but still retains a free energy barrier for closing. The simulations allowed the identification of the molecular origin of the closing penalty in case of bound ARG and suggested a mutation of lysine at position 373 to alanine that strongly reduced the penalty and allowed closing even in the presence of bound ARG. The study offers an explanation of the molecular mechanism of how ARG competitively inhibits GLN from binding to SBD2 and from triggering the transition to a closed conformation. The proposed Lys373Ala mutation shows promise as a potential tool to validate whether a conformational mismatch between open SBD2 and the translocator is responsible for preventing ARG uptake to the cell.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.