ArticleClinical cardiology2024
Impact of Immunosuppressive Therapy on Lead Dislodgement After Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Implantation.
Article in Clinical cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- How to Assess Risk Factors for Lead Dislodgement in Patients Receiving Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices-Reply.Clinical cardiology · 2025Article
- How to Assess Risk Factors for Lead Dislodgement in Patients Receiving Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.Clinical cardiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundsLead dislodgement is a severe complication in cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation. Inflammation after CIED implantation results in the development of adhesions between lead and tissues, resulting in the lead becoming fixed in the body. In patients with immunosuppressive therapy, however, adhesion is inhibited by anti-inflammatory effects. However, the association between lead dislodgement and immunosuppressive therapy has not been clarified. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between lead dislodgement and immunosuppressive therapy. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that lead dislodgement more frequently occur in patients with immunosuppressive therapy than those without.
methodsIn total, 651 consecutive patients who underwent CIED implantation or lead addition (age, 76 ± 11 years; and males, 374 [58%], high voltage device, 121 [19%], lead addition 23 [4%]) were retrospectively enrolled. Immunosuppressive therapy was with regular steroids or immunosuppressants. Lead placement was guided by fluoroscopy, and active fixation leads were used. Restraint of the upper limb by chest tape was performed for 1 week after the procedure. Lead dislodgement was defined as a change in lead position and/or lead failure requiring reoperation.
resultsTwenty (3.1%) patients received immunosuppressive therapy. Among these, 15 (2.3%) patients regularly took steroids and 8 (1.2%) took immunosuppressants. Lead dislodgement occurred in 10 (1.5%) patients. Lead dislodgement was more frequent in patients with immunosuppressive therapy than in those without (3 [15%] vs. 7 [1%], p = 0.003).
conclusionIn patients with CIED implantation or lead addition, lead dislodgement is more frequent in patients with immunosuppressive therapy than in those without.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.