Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38888104›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2024

A Complementary Multitechnique Approach to Assess the Bias in Molecular Weight Determination of Lignin by Derivatization-Free Gel Permeation Chromatography.

Daniel Papp, Göran Carlström, Tommy Nylander, Margareta Sandahl, Charlotta Turner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel PappDepartment of Chemistry, Centre for Analysis and Synthesis, Lund University, P.O. Box 124, Lund SE-22100, Sweden.
Göran CarlströmDepartment of Chemistry, Centre for Analysis and Synthesis, Lund University, P.O. Box 124, Lund SE-22100, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4981-2440
Tommy NylanderDepartment of Chemistry, Physical Chemistry, Lund University, P.O. Box 124, Lund SE-22100, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9420-2217
Margareta SandahlDepartment of Chemistry, Centre for Analysis and Synthesis, Lund University, P.O. Box 124, Lund SE-22100, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8796-2613
Charlotta TurnerDepartment of Chemistry, Centre for Analysis and Synthesis, Lund University, P.O. Box 124, Lund SE-22100, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9466-1149

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing interest in lignin valorization in the past decades calls for analytical techniques for lignin characterization, ranging from wet chemistry techniques to highly sophisticated chromatographic and spectroscopic methods. One of the key parameters to consider is the molecular weight profile of lignin, which is routinely determined by size-exclusion chromatography; however, this is by no means straightforward and is prone to being hampered by considerable errors. Our study expands the fundamental understanding of the bias-inducing mechanisms in gel permeation chromatography (GPC), the magnitude of error originating from using polystyrene standards for mass calibration, and an evaluation of the effects of the solvent and type of lignin on the observed bias. The developed partial least-squares (PLS) regression model for lignin-related monomers revealed that lignin is prone to association mainly via hydrogen bonding. This hypothesis was supported by functional group-based analysis of the bias as well as pulse field gradient (pfg) diffusion NMR spectroscopy of model compounds in THF-

Identifiers

PMID38888104
PMCPMC11223100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.