Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38888063›Full record

ArticleActa orthopaedica2024

The effectiveness of a protocol without routine radiographs for follow-up of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients (CURVE): a study protocol.

Jurre T F Baetsen, Miranda L Hooff, Pepijn Bisseling, Johanna M Van Dongen, Dineke G Van de Fliert, Eric Hoebink, Diederik H R Kempen, Joost P H J Rutges, Tom P C Schlösser, Hanneke M Van West and 4 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The ScolioscoopEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jurre T F Baetsen *Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen. Jurre.baetsen@radboudumc.nl.
Miranda L Hooff *Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen.
Pepijn BisselingDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen.
Johanna M Van DongenVrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Amsterdam Movement Science Research Institute, Amsterdam; Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam.
Dineke G Van de FliertDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen.
Eric HoebinkDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Amphia, Breda.
Diederik H R KempenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam.
Joost P H J RutgesDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam.
Tom P C SchlösserDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht.
Hanneke M Van WestDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam.
Philip J Van der WeesIQ Healthcare and Department of Rehabilitation, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen.
Paul C WillemsDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Marinus De KleuverDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen.
Dutch AIS consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeCurrent follow-up protocols for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) are based on consensus and consist of regular full-spine radiographs to monitor curve progression and surgical complications. Consensus exists to avoid inappropriate use of radiographs in children. It is unknown whether a standard radiologic follow-up (S-FU) approach is necessary or if a patient-empowered follow-up (PE-FU) approach can reduce the number of radiographs without treatment consequences. METHODS AND ANALYSES: A nationwide multicenter pragmatic randomized preference trial was designed for 3 follow-up subgroups (pre-treatment, post-brace, post-surgery) to compare PE-FU and S-FU. 812 patients with AIS (age 10-18 years) will be included in the randomized trial or preference cohorts. Primary outcome is the proportion of radiographs with a treatment consequence for each subgroup. Secondary outcomes consist of the proportion of patients with delayed initiation of treatment due to non-routine radiographic follow-up, radiation exposure, societal costs, positive predictive value, and interrelation of clinical assessment, quality of life, and parameters for initiation of treatment during follow-up. Outcomes will be analyzed using linear mixed-effects models, adjusted for relevant baseline covariates, and are based on intention-to-treat principle. Study summary: (i) a national, multicenter pragmatic randomized trial addressing the optimal frequency of radiographic follow-up in patients with AIS; (ii) first study that includes patient-empowered follow-up; (iii) an inclusive study with 3 follow-up subgroups and few exclusion criteria representative for clinical reality; (iv) preference cohorts alongside to amplify generalizability; (v) first study conducting an economic evaluation comparing both follow-up approaches.

Indexed as

RadiographyScoliosisAdolescentChildFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMalePragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID38888063
PMCPMC11181918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.