Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38888007›Full record

ReviewAdvances in wound care2024

Standardized Reporting of Research on Exosomes to Ensure Rigor and Reproducibility.

Anita Yadav, Yi Xuan, Chandan K Sen, Subhadip Ghatak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in wound care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Mapping GlycoRNAs on an Exosomal Surface.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anita YadavMcGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-5345-2783
Yi XuanMcGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4795-957X
Chandan K SenMcGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3151-5202
Subhadip GhatakMcGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5641-3902

Funding

Cell Specific Gene Editing to Close Diabetic WoundsR01DK135447 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Chandan K Sen · 2023 to 2026
$2.2M
Exosomes in wound healingR01DK129592 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Subhadip Ghatak · 2023 to 2026
$1.7M
Nanofabricated Devices and Nanomedicine Approaches for Wound HealingK25GM143572 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI XUAN, YI · 2021 to 2024
$624k
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK129592NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK135447NIGMS NIH HHS K25 GM143572
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

ExosomesBiomedical ResearchHumansRegenerative MedicineReproducibility of ResultsResearch Designclinical trialsEV-TRACKexosomeexosome-based therapiesextracellular vesiclesMISEVwound healing

Identifiers

PMID38888007
PMCPMC12344122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.