Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38887883›Full record

ArticleEuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology2024

Impact of leaflet splitting on coronary access after redo-TAVI for degenerated supra-annular self-expanding platforms.

Alessandro Beneduce, Arif A Khokhar, Jonathan Curio, Francesco Giannini, Adriana Zlahoda-Huzior, Daire Grant, Lisa Lynch, Pawel Zakrzewski, Won-Keun Kim, Francesco Maisano and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Chimney stenting for preventing coronary obstruction in redo-TAVI with balloon-expandable valves within self-expanding valves.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Role of leaflet modification in TAVI: to prevent coronary obstruction only or potentially a routine practice?EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alessandro BeneduceHeart Valve Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Arif A KhokharCardiology, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Jonathan CurioDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Center Cologne, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Cologne, Germany.
Francesco GianniniInterventional Cardiology Unit, IRCCS Galeazzi Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Adriana Zlahoda-HuziorClinical Research Center Intercard, Kraków, Poland.
Daire GrantBoston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, MA, USA.
Lisa LynchBoston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, MA, USA.
Pawel ZakrzewskiSimHub, Virmed, Kraków, Poland.
Won-Keun KimKerckhoff Heart Center, Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Francesco MaisanoHeart Valve Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Ole de BackerRigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Dariusz DudekDigital Medicine & Robotics Center, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoronary access (CA) is a major concern in redo-transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for failing supra-annular self-expanding transcatheter aortic valves (TAVs).

aimsThis ex vivo study evaluated the benefit of leaflet splitting (LS) on subsequent CA after redo-TAVI in anatomies deemed at high risk of unfeasible CA.

methodsEx vivo, patient-specific models were printed three-dimensionally. Index TAVI was performed using ACURATE neo2 or Evolut PRO (TAV-1) at the standard implant depth and with different degrees of commissural misalignment (CMA). Redo-TAVI was performed using the balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3 Ultra (TAV-2) at different implant depths with commissural alignment. Selective CA was attempted for each configuration before and after LS in a pulsatile flow simulator. The leaflet splay area was assessed on the bench.

resultsIn matched comparisons of 128 coronary cannulations across 64 redo-TAVI configurations, the overall feasibility of CA significantly increased after LS (60.9% vs 18.7%; p<0.001). The effect of LS varied according to the sinotubular junction height, TAV-1 design, TAV-1 CMA, and TAV-2 implant depth, given TAV-2 alignment. LS enabled CA for up to CMA 45° with the ACURATE neo2 TAV-1 and up to CMA 30° with the Evolut PRO TAV-1. The combination of LS and a low TAV-2 implant provided the highest feasibility of CA after redo-TAVI. The leaflet splay area ranged from 25.60 mm2 to 37.86 mm2 depending on the TAV-1 platform and TAV-2 implant depth.

conclusionsIn high-risk anatomies, LS significantly improves CA feasibility after redo-TAVI for degenerated supra-annular self-expanding platforms. Decisions on redo-TAVI feasibility should be carefully individualised, taking into account the expected benefit of LS on CA for each scenario.

Indexed as

Aortic ValveHeart Valve ProsthesisProsthesis DesignTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementAortic Valve StenosisCoronary VesselsHumansPrinting, Three-DimensionalProsthesis FailureReoperation

Identifiers

PMID38887883
PMCPMC11163438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.