Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38887868›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2025

Island restoration to rebuild seabird populations and amplify coral reef functioning.

Ruth E Dunn, Cassandra E Benkwitt, Olivier Maury, Nicolas Barrier, Peter Carr, Nicholas A J Graham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Island restoration to rebuild seabird populations and amplify coral reef functioning.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Atolls are vital for seabirds and vice versa.Nature ecology & evolution · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ruth E DunnLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0927-2734
Cassandra E BenkwittLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Olivier MauryInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement, Université de Montpellier, Sète, France.
Nicolas BarrierInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement, Université de Montpellier, Sète, France.
Peter CarrInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4400-6653
Nicholas A J GrahamLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.

Funding

Fondation Bertarelli
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mobile organisms like seabirds can provide important nutrient flows between ecosystems, but this connectivity has been interrupted by the degradation of island ecosystems. Island restoration (via invasive species eradications and the restoration of native vegetation) can reestablish seabird populations and their nutrient transfers between their foraging areas, breeding colonies, and adjacent nearshore habitats. Its diverse benefits are making island restoration increasingly common and scalable to larger islands and whole archipelagos. We identified the factors that influence breeding seabird abundances throughout the Chagos Archipelago in the Indian Ocean and conducted predictive modeling to estimate the abundances of seabirds that the archipelago could support under invasive predator eradication and native vegetation restoration scenarios. We explored whether the prey base exists to support restored seabird populations across the archipelago, calculated the nitrogen that restored populations of seabirds might produce via their guano, and modeled the cascading conservation gains that island restoration could provide. Restoration was predicted to increase breeding pairs of seabirds to over 280,000, and prey was predicted to be ample to support the revived seabird populations. Restored nutrient fluxes were predicted to result in increases in coral growth rates, reef fish biomasses, and parrotfish grazing and bioerosion rates. Given these potential cross-ecosystem benefits, our results support island restoration as a conservation priority that could enhance resilience to climatic change effects, such as sea-level rise and coral bleaching. We encourage the incorporation of our estimates of cross-ecosystem benefits in prioritization exercises for island restoration.

Indexed as

BirdsCharadriiformesConservation of Natural ResourcesCoral ReefsEnvironmental Restoration and RemediationAnimalsIndian OceanIntroduced SpeciesIslandscross‐ecosystem nutrientsecological processenergéticosenergeticsespecie invasorahabitat restorationinvasive speciesnutrientes transecosistémicosprocesos ecológicosresilienceresilienciarestauración de hábitattrópicostropics入侵物种恢复力栖息地恢复热带生态过程能量学跨生态系统的营养物质

Identifiers

PMID38887868
PMCPMC11780216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.