ArticleRSC advances2024
Predicting micropollutant removal through nanopore-sized membranes using several machine-learning approaches based on feature engineering.
Article in RSC advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Applying machine learning and AI for nanofiltration membranes water applications: a review.Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predicting the efficacy of micropollutant separation through functionalized membranes is an arduous endeavor. The challenge stems from the complex interactions between the physicochemical properties of the micropollutants and the basic principles underlying membrane filtration. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of a modest dataset on various machine learning tools (ML) tools in predicting micropollutant removal efficiency for functionalized reverse osmosis (RO) and nanofiltration (NF) membranes. The inherent attributes of both the micropollutants and the membranes are utilized as input factors. The chosen ML tools are supervised algorithm (adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system (NF), linear regression framework (linear regression (LR)), stepwise linear regression (SLR) and multivariate linear regression (MVR)), and unsupervised algorithm (support vector machine (SVM) and ensemble boosted tree (BT)). The feature engineering and parametric dependency analysis revealed that characteristics of micropollutants, such as maximum projection diameter (MaxP), minimal projection diameter (MinP), molecular weight (MW), and compound size (CS), exhibited a notably positive impact on the correlation with removal efficiency. Model combination with key variables demonstrated high prediction accuracy in both supervised and unsupervised ML for micropollutant removal efficiency. An NF-grid partitioning (NF-GP) model achieved the highest accuracy with an
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.