Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38887611›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2024

The effect of feedback timing on category learning and feedback processing in younger and older adults.

Kristen Nunn, Robert Creighton, Victoria Tilton-Bolowsky, Yael Arbel, Sofia Vallila-Rohter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kristen NunnMGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA, United States.
Robert CreightonMGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA, United States.
Victoria Tilton-BolowskyMGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA, United States.
Yael ArbelMGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA, United States.
Sofia Vallila-RohterMGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA, United States.

Funding

Determining the implicit and rule-based learning ability of individuals with aphasia to better align learning ability and interventionR21DC019203 · NIDCD · MGH INSTITUTE OF HEALTH PROFESSIONS · PI ROHTER, SOFIA VALLILA · 2021 to 2023
$480k
NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC019203
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Corrective feedback can be received immediately after an action or with a temporal delay. Neuroimaging studies suggest that immediate and delayed feedback are processed by the striatum and medial temporal lobes (MTL), respectively. Age-related changes in the striatum and MTL may influence the efficiency of feedback-based learning in older adults. The current study leverages event-related potentials (ERPs) to evaluate age-related differences in immediate and delayed feedback processing and consequences for learning. The feedback-related negativity (FRN) captures activity in the frontostriatal circuit while the N170 is hypothesized to reflect MTL activation. Methods: 18 younger ( Results: Younger adults learned better than older adults in the immediate timing condition. This performance difference was associated with a typical FRN signature in younger but not older adults. For older adults, impaired processing of immediate feedback in the striatum may have negatively impacted learning. Conversely, learning was comparable across groups when feedback was delayed. For both groups, delayed feedback was associated with a larger magnitude N170 relative to immediate feedback, suggesting greater MTL activation. Discussion and conclusion: Delaying feedback may increase MTL involvement and, for older adults, improve category learning. Age-related neural changes may differentially affect MTL- and striatal-dependent learning. Future research can evaluate the locus of age-related learning differences and how feedback can be manipulated to optimize learning across the lifespan.

Indexed as

agingcategory learningevent-related potentialsfeedbacktiming

Identifiers

PMID38887611
PMCPMC11182045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.