ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2024
Advancements in surgical education: exploring animal and simulation models in fetal and neonatal surgery training.
Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Physical simulation models for veterinary surgical training: a systematic review.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Pooled it
- Systematic review of the training process of minimally invasive surgery in neonates and infants.Pediatric surgery international · 2025Pooled it
- Bibliometric analysis of congenital diaphragmatic hernia research models: evolution and insights from the past three decades.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Review
- Laparoscopic training in porcine models: a tool for continuous professional skill enhancement for paediatric surgeons.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Article
- A porcineTranslational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Promoting the Dissemination of 3D Printing Technology in Reconstructing Critical-Sized Defects of Long Bone and Vertebral Body Through a "Six-in-One" Targeted Teaching Method.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
- Nationwide utilization patterns and perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive pediatric nephrectomy in Germany.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Exploring the future of robotic approaches in neonatal cardiac surgery: opportunities, barriers, and innovation pathways.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Review
- Innovative 3D-Printed Neonatal Chest Simulator for Intercostal Drainage Training: Design and Validation.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- The Role of Virtual Reality in Advancing Surgical Training in Otolaryngology: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- Development of a proptosis model as a surgical training tool for veterinary students and practitioners.The Veterinary recordArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Surgical education is undergoing a transformation, moving away from traditional models towards more modern approaches that integrate experiential and didactic methods. This shift is particularly pertinent in the realm of fetal and neonatal surgery, where specialized training is crucial. Historical training methods, such as cadaveric dissection, have been prevalent for centuries, but newer innovations, including animal and non-animal simulation models, are gaining prominence. This manuscript aims to explore the use of both animal and non-animal models in surgical education, with a specific focus on fetal and neonatal surgery. Animal models: The use of animal models in surgical training has a long history, dating back to Halsted's introduction in 1889. These models, often utilizing large animals like swine and dogs, offer valuable insights into fetal and neonatal surgeries. They allow for the study of long-term outcomes and the simulation of various diseases and anomalies, providing essential training experiences not readily available in human surgeries. However, there are notable limitations, including anatomical and physiological differences from humans, ethical considerations, and substantial infrastructure and maintenance costs. Simulation models: Simulation-based training offers several benefits, including standardized and safe learning environments without risks to real patients. Bench models, using synthetic materials or non-living animal tissue, provide cost-effective options for skills development. Virtual reality and 3-D printing technologies further enhance simulation experiences, allowing for the replication of complex clinical scenarios and patient-specific anatomies. While these models offer significant advantages, they lack the complexity of biological systems found in animal models. Conclusion: In conclusion, both animal and non-animal simulation models play crucial roles in enhancing surgical education, particularly in fetal and neonatal surgery. While advancements in non-animal technologies are important for ethical reasons, the continued necessity of animal models in certain areas should be acknowledged. By responsibly integrating these models into training programs, surgical education can be further enriched while upholding ethical standards and ensuring optimal patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.