Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38887470›Full record

ReviewClinical kidney journal2024

Ten tips from the Swiss Working Group on Sustainable Nephrology on how to go green in your dialysis unit.

Menno Pruijm, Elena Rho, Alexander Woywodt, Stephan Segerer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical kidney journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Green, Sustainable Nephrology: State of the Art Needs for Education and Implementation.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Menno PruijmService of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Hospital of Lausanne and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1027-1851
Elena RhoDivision of Nephrology, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0687-3753
Alexander WoywodtLancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS FT, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3825-6955
Stephan SegererDivision of Nephrology, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1936-9719

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The health-care system and particularly renal replacement therapy has a significant carbon footprint adding to global warming and extreme weather conditions. Improving sustainability has become the focus of national and international working groups. Many reviews underline the need for improvement of sustainability in nephrology, in particular dialysis, and provide recommendations on how to reduce waste, energy, and water consumption. However, how to implement these recommendations, and where to start, is not always clear. This paper summarizes discussions within the 'working group on sustainable nephrology' of the Swiss Society of Nephrology. We do not provide a detailed review of the topic but instead present a practical 10-point action plan to help health-care workers in nephrology make a start and improve the carbon footprint of their dialysis centres. We emphasize the importance of ongoing research, cooperation, and dialogue, and welcome additional ideas from the wider renal community.

Indexed as

global warminggreen dialysissustainable nephrologywaste managementwater consumption

Identifiers

PMID38887470
PMCPMC11180981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.