ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024
Tachyarrhythmias in congenital heart disease.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Narrow complex tachycardia in patients with congenital heart defects and following cardiac surgery : How can the ECG help?]Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2026Review
- Transesophageal echocardiography-guided anesthetic management of a patient with dilated cardiomyopathy, severe heart failure, and septic shock: a case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Catheter ablation of tachyarrhythmias in children: state of the art and future directions.Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2025Review
- Clinical and Electrophysiological Characteristics of Patients Developing Macroreentrant Atrial Tachyarrhythmias Following Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of arrhythmia · 2025Article
- Supraventricular Tachycardia in A Young Adult with Congenital Heart Disease: Successful Ablation after Patent Ductus Arteriosus Closure.European journal of case reports in internal medicine · 2025Article
- Antiarrhythmic Drug Use in Pregnancy: Considerations and Safety Profiles.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Review
- [[One patient, three arrhythmias. Case report]].Archivos peruanos de cardiologia y cirugia cardiovascularArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prevalence of congenital heart disease (CHD) in adult patients has risen with advances in diagnostic and surgical techniques. Surgical modifications and hemodynamic changes increase the susceptibility to arrhythmias, impacting morbidity and mortality rates, with arrhythmias being the leading cause of hospitalizations and sudden deaths. Patients with CHD commonly experience both supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias, with each CHD type associated with different arrhythmia patterns. Macroreentrant atrial tachycardias, particularly cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent flutter, are frequently reported. Ventricular arrhythmias, including monomorphic ventricular tachycardia, are prevalent, especially in patients with surgical scars. Pharmacological therapy involves antiarrhythmic and anticoagulant drugs, though data are limited with potential adverse effects. Catheter ablation is preferred, demanding meticulous procedural planning due to anatomical complexity and vascular access challenges. Combining imaging techniques with electroanatomic navigation enhances outcomes. However, risk stratification for sudden death remains challenging due to anatomical variability. This article practically reviews the most common tachyarrhythmias, treatment options, and clinical management strategies for these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.