ArticleNigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association
Mentees' Perspectives on the Factors that influence the Choice of Mentors in the Medical Profession.
Article in Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mentorship is an age-long act in most fields of learning. It plays a pivotal role in medical education. The strength of any mentorship relationship could have a direct bearing on the character traits of the mentor. We aimed to determine factors that influence the choice of mentors by potential mentees in a formal mentorship relationship among medical doctors in Rivers State, Nigeria. Methodology: This was a descriptive cross-sectional survey that recruited potential mentees by convenience sampling. A semi-structured questionnaire was distributed via a monkey survey. The tool had sections that addressed mentees' expectations, perceived factors that influence the choice of mentors, and ways to improve the mentors-mentee relationship, using a 5-point Likert scale. Data were analyzed. Results: Of the 162 mentees recruited, 95 (58.6%) were females. The predominant age group was 31-40 years (40.1%). The majority, 137 (84.6%), practiced in public hospitals, and 102 (63%) were non-specialist doctors. The most common factor that influenced the choice of mentors as indicated by 156 (96.3%) participants was the ability of the mentors to help the mentees advance in their fields and connect them to opportunities. The two most cited areas of interest for mentorship were leadership in health organizations and research. Over 90% of mentees agreed that the roles of effective mentors are discussing possible solutions to difficult issues, identifying opportunities, and sharing personal experiences. Conclusion: Mentorship enables the targeted development of mentees. When developing mentoring programs and evaluating mentors, it is important to consider mentees' opinions on the factors that impact their choice of mentors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38887439PMC11180283What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.