ReviewCureus2024
From Protection to Prevention: Redefining Vaccines in the Context of Antimicrobial Resistance.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antimicrobial resistance awareness and associated factors among family physicians in Turkey: a national cross-sectional study.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Antibiotic Use and Care-Seeking Practices for Childhood Diarrhea and Respiratory Illnesses in Community Settings in Bangladesh: A Cross-Sectional Caregiver Survey.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Social Determinants of Health and Antibiotic Consumption.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Oral care medications for the prevention and treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia in intensive care unit.Frontiers in oral health · 2025Review
- Community pharmacists' knowledge, beliefs, and perceived barriers toward vaccination services at community pharmacies: A cross-sectional study from Saudi Arabia.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024Article
- Design of a Glycoconjugate Vaccine AgainstVaccines · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a significant threat to global health, compromising the effectiveness of treatments and increasing medical risks. In this crisis, the importance of vaccines in reducing AMR is being increasingly acknowledged, although not thoroughly explored. This literature review asserts that vaccines can significantly lessen the occurrence of infections, thereby reducing the need for antibiotics and limiting the emergence of resistance. Vaccines play a crucial role in antimicrobial stewardship programs by preventing diseases that would otherwise necessitate the use of antibiotics. Expanding vaccine coverage supports responsible usage of antimicrobials and aligns with global health priorities to maintain effective medical interventions. This review emphasizes the need for equitable funding and policy support for vaccine initiatives comparable to new antibiotics and diagnostic techniques. Moreover, it calls for more detailed investigations into vaccines' economic and health benefits in managing AMR, highlighting their potential as cost-effective solutions to this urgent health challenge. Through a careful analysis of existing literature, this review highlights the fundamental role of vaccines in transforming the landscape of AMR, shifting the focus from a protective approach to a preventive health strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.